Archive for October, 2007

Mayor Newsom’s First Term: Let the Record Speak

Monday, October 1st, 2007

Gavin Newsom’s first term in office will be defined to a great degree by the status of homelessness in San Francisco. Since the Agnos administration, homelessness has consistently been at the top of the issues defining San Francisco’s politics. Newsom was elected mayor largely due to the electoral success of his Care Not Cash initiative and the implicit promise to reduce homelessness. After Care Not Cash, Newsom’s most important policy decisions were marked by his enthusiastic embracement of the Bush administration’s twin initiatives: the focus on a very narrow minority of the homeless population—the so-called “chronically homeless”—and the provision of supportive housing for those so labeled.

(more…)

Coalition on Homelessness: 20 Years

Monday, October 1st, 2007

Civil Rights

Homeless people are among the most disenfranchised and oppressed groups in our society nationwide. The lack of stable housing and the public exposure of every aspect of one’s life deepen and increase the impact of discriminations based on race, class, gender, disability, sexual orientation, age, sex, or immigration status. From our inception through the present, the Coalition on Homelessness has made itself a reputation as a defender of poor people’s rights.

Citation Defense

Homeless people are subjected to harassment through the criminal justice system because of their status. It is virtually impossible to sleep anywhere without breaking the law. Other life-sustaining activities are also penalized. Since 1995, the Coalition on Homelessness has provided access to legal representation to thousands of individuals who would otherwise have jeopardized their right to due process.

1995 – 2005

The City of San Francisco issued 167,074 citations for so-called “quality-of-life” offenses, fur crimes such as sleeping in public spaces, blocking the sidewalk, and panhandling. The Coalition on Homelessness, in partnership with the Lawyers’ Committee on Civil Rights and many volunteer attorneys, was able to provide legal assistance to 13,619 of those cases.

1996

Due to the work of the Coalition, the District Attorney’s office dropped over 39,000 citations and attached warrants given to homeless people during former Mayor Jordan’s Matrix program.

2006

The Coalition took on 1,795 cases for homeless individuals who had no other options for legal representation. Over 90% of these case were dismissed or had their fines reduced.

2007

The COH has taken over 1,400 cases so far this year, and has had an 80% success rate.

Street Watch

The Street Watch has been a vital tool to document abuses by police officers, mass displacements (the so-called “sweeps”), and illegal property confiscation by the Police Department and the Department of Public Works.

For instance, since 1988, seven major operations have been launched to get homeless people out of Golden Gate Park alone. Similar operations have been conducted on a regular basis throughout the city, particularly in the Bayview/Hunter’s Point and Mission districts. Coalition staff and volunteers, armed with cameras and forms to collect declarations from those who were being displaced, were able to minimize the impact of such operations on homeless people.

OTHER EFFORTS

1997

Organizing efforts among communities of homeless people resulted in the design of a vehicularly housed community in China Basin.

1999

Organizing work prevented the approval of legislation that would have increased the penalties for possessing a shopping cart.

Shelter

We work to see the day when no one will have to call a shelter home. In the meantime, we also fight to make sure that shelters are clean, safe, and respectful of the rights of their residents.

1992

The COH designed and advocated for the creation of the McMillan Center at 39 Fell Street (a facility better known by its address), an innovative 24-hour drop-in facility for substance users, which reduced the number of street deaths.

1993

Shelter clients now have the opportunity to appeal proposed disciplinary actions against them through an impartial appeals process. The Uniform Grievance Procedure was developed in collaboration with other organizations and is funded by the City to ensure shelter residents are not unfairly evicted from shelters, and are treated in an unbiased manner.

1994

The COH advocated for and designed A Woman’s Place, a drop-in center, shelter, and transitional housing program now assisting mentally disabled women, through the convening of the Homeless Women’s Task Force.

1998

The Coalition wrote and successfully advocated for adoption of a “No Turn Away” policy for families seeking emergency shelter in San Francisco. This policy guaranteed at-risk families access to City-provided shelter.

2000

The COH chaired the Single Adult Shelter Re-Design committee of the Continuum of Care. A set of recommendations emerged with unanimous support from all shelter directors, alongside residents and advocates, including longer stays in shelters, a Shelter Monitoring Committee, standardized intake, and more.

2002

The Coalition led the work that created the Mission Neighborhood Resource Center (MNRC), the first resource center in the Mission District with a focus on cultural competency. The MNRC provides multiple services to over 100 mostly Latino clients every day.

2005

Shelter Monitoring Committee legislation passed and the Committee formed. This committee tracks conditions in shelters and reports to the Board of Supervisors. This work has resulted in the exposure and correction of countless problems in the shelter system, resulting in more humane, livable conditions for all shelter residents.

2006, 2007

Twice in two consecutive years the Human Services Agency tried to shut down the city’s only 24/7 drop-in center for homeless people. Advocacy efforts led by the COH saved the McMillan Center (see above)—later converted to Buster’s Place—from permanent closure.

2007

The COH released Shelter Shock: Abuse, Cruelty, and Neglect in San Francisco’s Shelters. This report formed the foundation of a movement of having minimum standards of care in the shelter system, and helped push the Department of Public Health to pilot a project to ensure basic hygiene features in the two largest City-funded shelters.

A Government in Denial

Monday, October 1st, 2007

People are said to be in denial when they refuse to own up to issues that are confronting them… Issues they may refuse to own even though by not addressing them, they stand to lose loved ones, jobs, or the respect of family members and friends. In extreme cases, families pull together for interventions, or a boss may give the person an ultimatum: “Deal with your drinking or find another job.” Life in denial is way more common than most people think, and since most interventions are of a personal nature, the details are, and should be, nobody else’s business.

Unfortunately, when a large cumulative group of individuals band together with a collective case of denial and set public policy that effects all of us, that intervention must be very public and carried out with a firm ultimatum: Get over your denial or find another job.

Our government is in denial. (more…)

Street Stories: Troy Andrew Aney

Monday, October 1st, 2007

Troy Andrew Aney: See full story below
(more…)

Senate Committee Passes Flawed HUD Homeless Bill

Monday, October 1st, 2007

On Wednesday, September 19, the Senate Banking Committee passed S. 1518, the Community Partnership to End Homelessness Act (CPEHA). CPEHA re-authorizes the HUD Homeless Assistance Programs.

S. 1518 is flawed in numerous respects:

Definitions of Homelessness

S. 1518 expands the definition of homeless beyond the current HUD definition by including:

  1. People in motels paid for by a government program or charity;
  2. People who are doubled-up, but only IF they have moved three times in one year or two times in the past 21 days, AND they have been notified by the owner or renter of their lodging that they can only stay for a short time period, AND they don’t have resources to contribute to rent; and
  3. People who are in motels, but only IF they have moved three times in one year or two times in the past 21 days, AND they can only pay for the room for a short period of time

This expansion is inadequate and harmful in many respects. It would force families and youth in motels and who are doubled-up to move repeatedly before they are eligible for HUD homeless assistance. Routine, stability, and consistency are essential for healthy child and youth development. Each and every move is traumatic for children, especially those in deep poverty. This provision would harm children and youth by waiting until multiple moves have occurred before assistance is provided, and thus contribute to developmental delays, educational disruption, and other negative impacts. Moreover, this provision will be very hard, if not impossible, for providers to verify with any degree of accuracy. Families and youth in crisis may have a hard time proving their multiple moves, especially when safety issues are present. Transportation issues for public schools also become more complicated and costly with multiple moves.

Community Collaboration

Important provisions were stripped from the bill regarding how recipients are evaluated, including the extent to which they address the needs of relevant special populations (including persons with disabilities, children and families, unaccompanied youth, and veterans) and whom should be consulted in the development of the application, including homeless education liaisons and persons experiencing homelessness.

Permanent Housing Set-Asides

S. 1518 maintains a set-aside for permanent supportive housing that denies communities the ability to meet the needs of all homeless populations that they identify, including families with children and unaccompanied youth.

Next Steps: There is still opportunity for changes to be made to S. 1518 prior to the bill heading to the Senate floor for a vote. The grassroots advocacy in the few days prior to the committee mark up drew greater attention to the problems in the bill, and there is widening concern about its impact.

Action Needed: Please call your US Senators and ask them to urge Senators Jack Reed (D-RI) and Christopher Dodd (D-CT) to eliminate the requirement that families and individuals in doubled-up and motel situations make multiple moves in order to be eligible for HUD homeless assistance, to restore critical selection criteria that were removed in committee, and to ensure that communities can meet the needs of all homeless populations. Contact information for Senators may be found at http://www.senate.gov.

Timing: Please act soon. It is unclear when the bill will head to the Senate floor, but action in the next month is likely.

For More Information: Please contact Barbara Duffield at bduffield@naehcy.org or 202.364.7392.